Friday, September 9, 2011

The Woman in Black: Susan Hill

Tell me...isn't this a fantastic cover? I love the simplicity of it, I love the font and the shades of grey. The "21" is for 21 years of the Vintage Publishing in the UK, and in the series they are republishing "twenty-one of our most iconic books in a rainbow of beautiful colours." Well, yes, please. I am such a book geek that I would like to have all twenty-one, and I don't even care which books the other twenty are.

Enough about design. Let's talk book for a moment or two. From the back blurb:

Arthur Kipps, a junior solicitor, is summoned to attend the funeral of Mrs Alice Drablow, the sole inhabitant of Eel Marsh House. Unaware of the tragic secrets which lie there, wreathed in fog and mystery, it is not until he glimpses a wasted young woman, dressed all in black, at the funeral that a creeping sense of unease begins to take hold, a feeling deepened by the reluctance of the locals to talk of the woman in black - and her terrible purpose.

All of the classic elements are here. The eerie and seemingly abandoned house, secluded in location that is entirely subject to the tides for its access. The bucolic English village, where everyone seems to know everything but won't talk. The large landowner, set apart from the others and viewed with a degree of distrust and jealousy. And the young, ambitious man who arrives in town proud of what his employer has asked him to do, and determined to see it through.

What really surprised me about The Woman in Black is how compressed the time is. The book is only 200 pages with a decent sized font and good spacing so it shouldn't come as a surprise, but the plot is crafted so carefully that the short period of time which actually covers Arthur's time at Eel Marsh House seems to be weeks, months. This compression adds to the intensity of the scenes where things literally go bump - and scream - in the night.

This book is also so visual in its crafting that I saw, I exactly saw what the author crafted, and am now convinced that Eel Marsh House is a real place.

It [the house] was remarkable and extraordinary in only one respect - its situation. From every window - and they were tall and wide in each room - there was a view of one aspect or the other of the marshes and the estuary and the immensity of the sky, all colour had been drained and blotted out of them now, the sun had set, the light was poor, there was no movement at all, no undulation of the water, and I could scarcely make out any break between land and water and sky. All was grey. I managed to let up every blind and to open one or two of the windows. The wind had dropped altogether, there was no sound save the faintest, softest suck of water as the tide crept in. How one woman had endured day after day, night after night, of isolation in this house, let alone for so many years, I could not conceive. I should have gone mad.

The "softest suck of water as the tide crept in." How is that so descriptive, so accurate, and so ominous at the same time? I can hear that sound, I've heard it a thousand times, and yet at this moment that suck of water feels threatening.

The Woman in Black is a fine, creepy novel that left me shivering at points, had me creeping out of bed for a glass of water in my dark flat convinced there was going to be a woman in black waiting for me in the kitchen. (There wasn't.)


This is who I was expecting. So let's talk about the film for a minute, since that's the reason I picked the book in the first place. If you haven't seen the teaser trailer, spend 1:44 on it now.




In retrospect, this long-form trailer suggests a plot perhaps quite embellished from the book. And you know what? I think that's great. For one, I want to see this film as a film as opposed to a line-by-line redo of the book, and there's some immensely frightening stuff going on here. However, the teaser trailer has more of a bookish feel:



(And...it's a Hammer film!!! Don't ask me why, but I have a strong affinity for Hammer as a production company.)

Either way, I'm still game. A finely-crafted novel can become a well-tuned film. I have the chills just thinking about it. So we have a very win-win situation here: a creepy, atmospheric book well worth a read, that looks like it's been turned into a frightening, well-crafted film well worth a see.

I love it when that happens.

22 comments:

Nymeth said...

I want all 21 of those books too. I saw them all together at a bookshop recently and they just look so gorgeous.

I found this book incredibly atmospheric and I'm very excited about the film. Like you, I think a departure from the original story might not be a bad thing. I'm also quite tempted to go see the stage adaptation one day, as I've heard great things about it.

Kailana said...

I read this book earlier in the year and enjoyed it. It is a very popular selection for the R.I.P. challenge this time around, so I look forward to all of the reviews.

Daphne said...

Wow, the trailer looks great. I loved the book. Those old broken toys! I can't wait to see this. I never see films in the theater but I want to see this one on the big screen. Love it!!

DesLily said...

i want to read this book too! and the movie looks excellent!! I think Radcliffe has just discovered his nitch in movies! He very much "looks" the part and I am guessing his acting will be as well done, at least I hope so!

Chrisbookarama said...

I finished this book this week and really enjoyed it. It was the right amount of creepy!

*^_^* said...

Great review!
This book is great, I read it three times.

Kate said...

Nymeth, a few years ago Harper Collins came out with a LOTR box set (Centennial edition, I think?) that looked so lovely together I had to have it. Have never even read these copies, just loved the look of them.

I hadn't thought of a stage adaptation of this. On one hand it seems like it would make the action so immediate and intimate, but on the other I wonder if the atmosphere, this incredible outdoor landscape which is so important, can be transferred to the stage? I think for that reason as well I'm pretty excited for the film - the landscape should translate well there.

Me too, Kailana! Now that I'm finished with it I can finally read other reviews!

Daph, don't the clowns just freak you out a little bit? They do me, at least, especially the mechanical one that does a very anatomically bizarre backbend. Yes, this is definitely a big screen one for me. (Oooo, and I'm going to see the new Jane Eyre adaptation today too! Speaking of atmosphere...)

DesLily, I have great hopes for Radcliffe's ability to *not* be Harry Potter. This looks like an excellent role for him as well, and definitely against the young wizard grain :) I'd love to see him in a musical as well, but I bet it's nigh on impossible to get those tickets.

Chris, you're spot on with the "right amount of creepy"! It didn't keep me up at night but I swear I was expecting a spectral creature in my kitchen when I got up in the middle of the night!

Thanks, emoticon! I think it would definitely stand up to rereads.

Carl V. said...

Of course I didn't at all bother reading this past the first paragraph because I'm hoping to get my own copy in from the library in the next few weeks. Then I can come back. :)

dooliterature said...

This book has gotten a lot of attention lately, and I cannot wait to read it. And the movie - even the trailers give me the willies.
Great review! (:

Shelley said...

I must be really out of it because I didn't even know a movie was coming out! This sounds like a great book, and I love the cover. It's going on my ever growing RIP list.

contemplatrix said...

I only just learned of the film, how deliciously creepy looking. I think I am going to have to make myself see it (though I am admittedly a big baby about scary films)...your review does reassure me, however, that I must read this book.

~L (omphaloskepsis)

Trish said...

Gosh this does look like a good book. I'll have to read it before I see the film, though.

Cath said...

As I said to you in your comment on The Small Hand, I think The Woman in Black is my favourite of Susan Hill's ghost stories and one of my all time fav ghostly yarns. I can't wait for the movie to come out either. I've seen the dramatisation that your picture comes from and that in itself was quite terrifying. I deal better with written ghost stories than dramas it seems. Like Nymeth I'd like to see the stage production but was put off the price of tickets.

A really nice review.

couchpotatocritic said...

I haven't read this book yet, but it's on my list -- it's the perfect addition to the Gothic Reading Challenge.

The trailer for the movie looks awesome! I saw it several months ago, and it had me shuddering. I don't think I'll see it in theatres (nothing will ruin the experience for others than my screaming and hiding under my chair like a wimp), but I'm definitely going to check it out when it's available for rent.

Kate said...

Carl, I don't blame you..I did the same with quite a few previous reviews in the RIP list.

Thanks, dooliterature! The movie is what actually turned me on to the book, and I'm grateful for both.

Shelley, I'm the opposite - I was surprised to find out the movie was based on a book! :)

L, I too am a complete baby with scary movies. Yet somehow I always *want* to watch them. I'm getting the feeling that the movie might be more exaggerated in its frightfulness than the book, which I think was a bit more of a constant-low-level-chiller sort of scary. Good luck either way!

Trish, it's the same with me - I knew I'd want to see the movie was rushed out to read the book first.

Cath, I didn't realize the still of the woman that I put up wasn't from the movie! Do you know what version this was?

Couchpotato, how funny! Yes, sometimes I scream a little bit at scary movies - always amusing to others. But this one I'm definitely going to see in the theater and I can't wait for it!

Cath said...

Kate, I'm pretty sure it's from the 1989 TV version here:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Woman-Black-DVD-Region-NTSC/dp/B00004UEEU/ref=sr_1_1?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1318329101&sr=1-1

I remember it as being very, very good.

Kate said...

Thanks for that, Cath! I'll see if I can find it online or at my library. I may shortly be going into TWIB overload!

olduvaireads said...

I'm still waitlisted for this book! I seem to have been number 3 for the longest time....

couchpotatocritic said...

Movies always scare me so much more than books do. I'm looking forward to reading/seeing both. :)

TJS 101 said...

I remember seeing the stage play a while ago and the ending was so odd that the only response of the audience was a kind of sad laughter and the dreaded "slow handclap". I for one am very thrilled that there is an updated version of this, the purpose of art is not to be static - especially in the creative medium - as the world moves and art must move with it, Count me in (as always) I'm a sucker for a good scare! T.

Kate said...

Ooo, the slow clap! I love that - the confused, "I don't know what I'm supposed to feel right now" applause.

I too love seeing clever adaptations in the process of making and creating stories. There's the tiny little legal geek inside me that squeaks, "copyright!!" but as long as that's covered, I adore seeing good adaptations. So many people are visual people who can get much more out of a film than they can a book, and I've never been the sort of person who thinks that the book is canon and not to be touched. Shakespeare in particular lends itself so well to adaptation, but the world doesn't stop there.

Jo said...

Thanks so much for this review. I just finished reading "The Woman in Black" yesterday, and I agree with you that it was excellent, with a haunting atmosphere. I was definitely gripped in fear and panic during some of the scenes, like when Arthur saw the Woman in Black at the window, and in the last pages of the book (my heart broke for Arthur--it was a very abrupt way to end the book).

I'm seeing the film on Friday. I'm excited for it!