Monday, October 10, 2011

The Lantern group read, week 1


I've never done a group read before, unless you count various and sundry challenges which might have a limited number of reading options. (Shakespeare Reading Challenge, where are you?? Oh my gosh, and how could I have forgotten the Anna Karenina Support Group? Ok, now I'm sorry I dismantled the site.) When this book, The Lantern by Deborah Lawrenson, came up as a group read for this year's RIP VI - and the book became available at my local library - I thought, "Why not?" The RIP is always a very active group, and I thought it would be fun to participate. Of the three books on offer for the group read, The Lantern sounded best for me:
When Eve falls for the charming, secretive Dom, their whirlwind romance leads them to Les Genevriers, a run-down, yet beautiful house int he South of France. But as summer fades to autumn, Eve finds it impossible to ignore the mysteries the house seems to be hiding - not least the strange disappearance of Dom's beautiful first wife. And what is the connection to a young girl who lived in the house decades before?

As Les Genevriers' tangled history begins to unravel, and Dom grows increasingly distant, Eve must discover the secrets of the past - before history has a chance to repeat itself.

I chose a few of the week one questions to post about in this discussion. As a fair warning, I have already read the whole book; I'll mark clearly for any spoilers, but it's more likely that my opinions are coloured by having completed the novel as opposed to just the first two sections.

Question 2. The book appears to be following the experiences of two different women, alternating back and forth between their stories. Are you more fond of our main protagonist's story or of Benedicte's or are you enjoying them both equally?

This is always somewhat of a problem for me, narratively. I find that I identify with one narrator first and quickly, and then spend a lot of time impatiently reading the second narrator's pieces, waiting to get back to the first. In this instance I latched on to "Eve" as my narrator-of-choice. This could be simple logistics: "Eve" has the first chapter and narration (not counting the very brief prologue.) It could also be identification: I have more in common with a slightly melancholic twenty-something woman caught in questions of self-identity than I do with a Frenchwoman living on a farm in the past. I found our main protagonist more interesting, and with more of a clear narrative line than Benedicte's ruminations on her family and growing up.

Question 3. The Lantern is a book filled with descriptions of scents. How are you liking (or disliking) that aspect of the book? How do you feel about the lavish description of scents? How are the short chapters working for you?

Honestly, I found it interesting for awhile and then a little repetitive. Part of this is from personal experience. A long, long time ago I worked at Bath and Body Works for a long, long time, and it was during this time they introduced their Le Couvant des Minimes line (which I loved, for the record, and which they no longer produce. Apparently the place itself, Le Couvant, is still going, but L'Occitane does their spa and products. And frankly, they were pretty similar lines to begin with - Le Couvant and L'Occitane. ) As a part of this product launch we had some rather good training in the scents and the products of Provence, primarily in the lavender, lemon, and honey areas, and how they were traditionally used. At the same time I was writing my novel and included a tiny bit that utilized this training to reflect the lavender aroma and the nostalgia it evoked in my character. So at first, when The Lantern harks on about scent and its particular place in the south of France, I smiled in recognition of this both as a truth and as a place-setting device. But to me, it very quickly became repetitive, [slight spoiler] even with Marthe's developing talents [end of spoiler]. However, it definitely is evocative of place, and I would rather be engaged with multiple senses than having to rely on visual cues alone.

Sometimes the short chapters are rather jarring. I think this also plays into my feelings about the dual narrative as I discussed above: the structure of the book with its short chapters and dual narrative makes me feel disjointed from both plots and doesn't help me try to fully identify with either narrative.

Bonus question: Did anyone else hear "Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again" ringing in their ears through the first sections of the book?

Yes. Yes yes yes yes yes. [spoiler again] And it only got more pervasive as the book continued. [end of spoiler]

There we have it, week one! I'm looking forward to seeing how everyone else is getting along.

7 comments:

Caroline said...

I wrote in detail in my post why the descriptions didn't work for me. Sometimes I liked them but all in all, it is too much and, like you, I found it tiring. In creative writing courses you are often taught to use exact words, not just write "tree" but, birch, pine whatever. In this novel I learn why this isn't always good advice. There are so many details, it's distracting. I'm also very familiar with the South of France as I spent all my childhood holidays there or in Brittany. "My Provence" is different. The storyline has a similarity with Rebecca but the writing is very different.

Kate said...

I'll have to look at yours when I scoot over to the Mr Linky. I imagine your familiarity with the terrain might have both helped and hindered you!

Daphne said...

I'm reading this too! I probably won't do a full post for the first week since work is CRAZY but I will participate in the comments! (I might try to make up the post this weekend)

There is a lot of description, but I'm sort of getting into it now. I'm also finding the "voice" of the two different storylines too similar and it's hard to tell them apart at first.

Carl V. said...

I've had exactly the same experience on some (but not all) two narrator books that you have. In particular I am thinking of After Dark and also Hard-boiled Wonderland and the End of the World by Haruki Murakami. Both are excellent novels and I consider them favorites, but in both I liked one narrative better than the other, most particularly in After Dark. I don't skim, but I did find myself in that novel especially wishing during one section I could quickly get back to the other.

It took awhile for the short chapters to grow on me, which is not normally the case when I read. But perhaps that is because it often means going from one narrator to the other and then back so it took awhile longer than normal for me to feel immersed in this section of the book.

I mentioned on my site in response to your comment that I fall on the side of the scent descriptions not bothering me at all. Granted I am only a third of the way through the book but I've been enjoying the way in which they make this novel set in a contemporary time period feel older and more like classic novels in the romantic tradition. We'll see how I feel as I read more.

I'm glad I wasn't the only one channeling the voice of the narrator from Rebecca. LOL!

Oh, and it is wonderful to have you doing this as your first group read. I just started doing group reads like this a few months back and am loving the interaction.

Kristen M. said...

I've read through Part 4 now (oops!) and I certainly found that as I went on, the narrators evened out for me and I am looking forward to both stories equally. This is where the short chapters come in handy because I don't want to wait too long to find out what is happening next in the other story line!

The scents have started getting on my nerves too as they are quite repetitive. I'm also not entirely sure why they are relevant to the story. I understand that they're Marthe's thing but they figure quite heavily and don't seem to be a part of much except for a little haunting.

naida said...

I have The Lantern waiting to be read here as well.
Interesting post. Sorry to hear some of the book is repetitive.

Carl V. said...

I think you'll enjoy this one, naida, and I certainly don't find any of it repetitive.